Scholars & Scribes Review the Rulings: The Supreme Court's 2017-2018 Term


The Supreme Court’s 2017-2018 term will soon be over, but the need for serious analysis has just begun. Did the High Court get the big cases right? What will the Court’s ruling in Trump v. Hawaii mean for immigration and executive power? Is the future for religious freedom secure in the wake of Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission? How will Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone, the partisan gerrymandering cases, impact the upcoming mid-term elections? Will Janus v. AFSCME sound the death knell for public employee unions across the country? How will the Court’s arbitration agreements in Epic Systems affect employers and employees? What response, if any, is necessary from Congress following South Dakota v. Wayfair, the internet sales tax case? Did any broader themes of the Roberts Court emerge this term, and has Justice Gorsuch changed the balance of the Court?

 

Please join us as our distinguished panels of practitioners and correspondents debate these and more from the 2017-2018 term.



Source link

Articles You May Like

Bill Barr Used This One Figure To Prove Nationwide Injunctions Are A Problem
Pres. Trump can’t withhold tax returns from Congress without asserting executive privilege, IRS memo draft argues
‘God literally led us to this place’: Pastor credits ‘divine intervention’ for leading him to kidnapped 8-year-old girl
The Divine Plan: John Paul II, Ronald Reagan, and the Dramatic End of the Cold War
For Trump, the border wall battle isn’t about his base – it’s about his people

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *